durrrr HU challenge

turbut jau skaitete ar 2+2 ar dar kur:

http://www.bluffmagazine.com/poker-news/Tom-Dwan-Issues-the-Million-Dollar-Challenge-1705.htm

vienu zodziu durrrr meta issuki bet kam, isskyrus Phil Galfondui, zaisti HU 50k handu, jei durrrr laimi bent viena doleri, jis laimi side beta is oponento 500k$, bet jei jis pralaimi, tai oponentas laimi 1,5m$. taigi, salygos atrodo lyg ir geros, bet ar kas isdris? butu super stebeti toki matcha.

įdomu kodėl su Galfondu nenori. šiaip išties įdomu, manau, kad Ivey gal galėtų išdrįsti, mačiau daugiausiai praeitą menesį Full Tilt buvo užkalęs, na daugiausia turbūt ne prieš durrr

Ivey gal galėtų išdrįsti, mačiau daugiausiai praeitą menesį Full Tilt buvo užkalęs, na daugiausia turbūt ne prieš durrr

Kad ten jie visi Full Tilto high-steikuose iš Guy Laliberte dukterinių accountų gyvena, manau

įdomu kodėl su Galfondu nenori. šiaip išties įdomu, manau, kad Ivey gal galėtų išdrįsti, mačiau daugiausiai praeitą menesį Full Tilt buvo užkalęs, na daugiausia turbūt ne prieš durrr

manau pries galfonda del to nenori, nes jis nera favoritas pries ji ir be to galfondas galetu realiai priimti toki issuki.

o ivey mano manymu nepriims issukio, del to jo ir neisbraukia is saraso. 50k handu yra labai daug, jei neklystu ivey per visus praejusius metus suzaide kazkur 90k handu ir uzkale kazkur 8 milijonus, o cia 4tablint pries viena is sudetingiausiu oponentu nera prasmes. nebent grynai tik del issukio.

kazkaip as dvejoju, kad kas pasirasys, nes visu pirma 50k handu yra laaaabai daug, 2+2 yra apie tai diskusija ir ten rasoma, kad realiai niekas nera zaides pries kazka tiek handu HU. nesu as HU cash zaidejas, todel kazkas kas zaidzia galetu paskaiciuoti kiek cia reikia zaisti, kad suzaisti tiek handu.

gal mano skaiciavimai klaidingi, tarkim vienam stale HU suzaidi 200 handu per valanda. iseina 250 valandu, 4 tablinant iseina 62.5 valandos non stop action 200/400$

galetu cardrunnersai susimest ir pasiusti koki CTS ar Stingeri

čia tipo non stop turėtu tiek žaist?

Aha - savaitę kapotųsi. :]

Na tarkime kas nors priima iššūkį, tai kai eis jau viskas į pabaigą, o kažkuris ženkliau bus prieky, galima vis foldint ir foldint, tik ant skaičiaus handų pavaryt, biškį paminusuos, bet pasibaigus 50k handų gaus savo papildomus pinigus. žinoma, gal tokie rimti vyrai taip nesielgtų, bet plius minus rizikingesnių potų jau neloštų tai faktas, prieš galą..

Na tarkime kas nors priima iššūkį, tai kai eis jau viskas į pabaigą, o kažkuris ženkliau bus prieky, galima vis foldint ir foldint, tik ant skaičiaus handų pavaryt, biškį paminusuos, bet pasibaigus 50k handų gaus savo papildomus pinigus. žinoma, gal tokie rimti vyrai taip nesielgtų, bet plius minus rizikingesnių potų jau neloštų tai faktas, prieš galą..

Kažkodėl nemanau, kad persvara būtų ant tiek nežymi, kad pabaigoje ją galėtų nulemti keletas handų. Turbūt sužaidus apie 40-45 k handų būtų aišku kuris laimėjo, o kitas pasiduotų nes nebebūtų prasmės tęsti. Beje, mes gi pamiršome geriausią pasaulio žaidėją - Phil Helmuth . Manau šis tikrai turėtų priimti iššūkį prisiminus kaip ant Dwano putojo po gauto bad beato heads-up champe. Gal šios lažybos ir yra subtili užuomina Philui?

biski ne i tema, bet susija.

kazkaip sito anksciau nezinojau, bet gal kazkam irgi bus idomu. pries keleta metu jis susilazino su raptor, kad jis laimes pries sachmatu GM, jei jis neturi boksto. lazybu suma 50k zalio. raptor suorganizavo ne GM, o IM. is esmes didelio skirtumo ner. apsilimui zaide is 5k zalio, kai IM be zirgo ir veliau "main eventas" kai be boksto. aisku durrrr neturejo absoliuciai jokiu shansu yra ir partijos sudetos su ejimais.

http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=10970199&page=0&fpart=1&vc=1

Na jeigu butu pries p.Helmutha, tai tada ir as paziureciau kelis machus, o labiausiai noreciau stebeti Helmutha per webcam'a, kaip jis putotu gaves byta )

O siaip duras pasitiki savim, tik manau kito tokio pasitikincio neatras savo issukiui :-)

Paziurejau as tas partijas - kad beviltiskas tas durrr ant sachmatu Gal ir as suzaisciau pries ji - be zirgo/rikio laisvai, gal ir be boksto - o mano lygis tai kaip ir nulinis

reikia Domcei paskambint

o jei rimtai, tai būtų labai keista, jei niekas nepriimtų tokio iššūkio. Aišku 50k handų headsup yra nemažas grindas, turbūt dauguma iš realiausių pretendentų būtent dėl to atkristų, kaip pvz Phil Ivey

no offense to anyone but this isn't a challenge any pro is willing to take. the only people that should be playing durrr are the ones that are physically willing am to burn a million dollars in real money for their own sick pleasure. durrr is a sicko, period. kid has no fear of losing money, this is a quality that other HSNLers lack. That's the QUALITY needed to be a true nose bleeder. I've read all these blogs and it really seems like a lot of hsnler's are literally too intelligent to succeed at the really high level. You have to have no care for money at all to even compete with durrr in this challenge. So, my list would consist of LARS LUZAK, Patrik Antonius, Phil Ivey. There simply isn't anyone else that I could imagine adding to this list. Like I said, if you can't lose 500k and wake up the next morning like nothing happened, then playing someone like durrr or even those insane stakes is a terrible idea. Literally, NEVER go into those games unless you're willing to burn 1 million US dollars for your own sick pleasure.(obv not trying to get you to burn a 1 million dollars but you get the idea). And I have nothing against anyone that can't deal with the swings at that level, I'm simply giving my input here.

Also, durrr would probably enjoy playing ANYONE, including his "close" friends out of his own sick pleasure. The only reason he said he wouldn't play OMGclayaiken is because he plays like a turtle that takes 5 minutes to make decisions in every hand. Durrr would rather go to the dentist than play someone like that.

The dang brothers are good, but like a lot of other HSNLer's, they're too intelligent to put themselves through the pain durrr/antonius do. They always try to reduce their variance and try to avoid gambles. So I don't even think they would consider taking this challenge, ALTHOUGH they DO have a very good chance(either of them) vs durrr. They are probably the best but they are just very cautious and would not risk this amount of money against durrr.

Lars-Luzak, is simply a european legend that's been through crazy ups and downs at the high stake level. He enjoys a cigarette every once in a while so you can only imagine what his personality is like. Pain, pain, pain, that's all this character is thinking about. Definitely would be exciting seeing him play durrr, but I also don't think he would want to risk this amount of money in a challenge against durrr. No offense to lars, but I think one of the dang brothers would have a better shot from a theory standpoint. I feel as if, lars has what it takes as far as dealing with the swings, bankroll, but is not anywhere near durrr's level in terms of theory(thanks to 2+2).

Patrik Antonius against durrr would be an "even" match IMO. Both players are solid and they both enjoy gambling. The one characteristic that differentiates Patrik and Phil are their gamble inside them. Patrik is more disciplined than Phil Ivey thus making him less exploitable in certain spots. Phil Ivey has a lot of gamble in him and is willing to push very small edges. Now the question in mind is, is a player like Phil Ivey or Patrik antonius physically capable of playing 4 tables at once vs an internet legend? Playing 4 tables against someone turns the game of poker into a video game, as opposed to 1 tabling where you get fewer hands, etc. Durrr will have a huge edge against Patrik or Phil due to the nature of 4 tabling, which is something they are inexperienced doing especially against one opponent.(i highly doubt these guys have ever played 4 tables of heads up vs the same opponent.)

As far as most 2+2er's, whom I care dearly for, I really think there's this mindset that a lot of successful 2+2er's have. Everyone wants to be happy all the time, and that's something really hard to achieve, especially at the nose bleed level. At the nose bleed level, you can lose 200-300k and never get a chance to get the money back for a couple of days. This is a huge pain to swallow for many HSNLer's. A lot of them have their family members reading their blogs, etc, which is like going to be strange when they say things like "well I lost 200k and I don't know if someone will even give me a chance to play again". They would be happier if they stuck to 25/50 where they could be like "hey I made 30k today, but I lost 10k yesterday, but I'm still up 20k!". The reality of those nose bleed stakes is that you literally have to have no regard for money. Does Durrr even have a blog? I don't think he does.

The whole blogging thing is really cool, and I really do enjoy reading blogs because a lot of poker players are amazingly smart people. It's just, when you're talking in figures of 200-400k in 1 night, and it really hurts you emotionally, then you're just causing too much pain to those who care for you.

I think, anyone that is capable of being hurt by this loss, is automatically not on my list. That will basically leave... Phil Ivey, Patrik Antonius, and Lars. No one else is capable of handling the variance in those games. Honestly, durrr's edge is magnified by the fact that there's so much scared money in those games.

Cia labai geras postas, apibendrinantis sita situacija.

del scared money, tai abejoju, kad kazkas eitu i sita reikala 100% su savo $, tikrai atsirastu tokiu kurie noretu susimest. kitokio varianto net ir nematau, todel labai scary nebutu, tik gal biski

kas cia per "nose bleed" terminas?