whats your poker IQ

2+2 radau idomu testa, patiko, kad tikros kortos, ir pazistamos situacijos, aisku, jei toki kortu run'a gautum realiai zaisdamas...butu fantastika

https://www.testyourpoker.com/poker/index.php

surinkau 130, is pradziu nelabai kreipiau demesi i zaideju nikus, kurie parodo jo zaidimo stiliu, todel prastai suzaidziau pries "pro" su QQ, kai jis turejo AA atrodo zemam flope viska sustumem, taip kad kreipkit i tai demesi.

dar kita klaida padariau, kai callin stationas pats betino, o as turejau atrodo KK, A highflope ir netikejau, kad turi A, taip kad zaideju apibudinimas labai supaprastina "reada". manau, kad perzaides gal surinkciau daugiau, bet darbe daug trukdziu

nemananau, kad to IQ skaiciavimas labai jau tikslus, bet mazdaug kazka parodo (ar moki pozicija zaist, ar moki oddsus ir t.t.)

cia forume tema.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=255852&page=3

have fun

edit: geriau neskaitykit kitu zmoniu komentaru i sita threada, nes tai gali padaryti itakos jusu testui, jei laikysit, skaitykit paskui

105 :]

Norejau ir as pasitikrinti, bet kazkokia klaida meta...

105 :]

tada vadinas blogas cia testas gal

118 čiūvai 2p2 nuo stalo nulipa ko ne su 2k$ ir nesurenka 100 IQ

PokerIQScore™ is 136!.

Net paciam keista Aisku, pasinaudojau Dzemo podzkazke ir numeciau damas po Pro didelio 3bet flope Bet kitos podzkazkes specialiai neskaiciau, kad butu idomiau

Ant calling stationo irgi issiduriau nepaziurejes i varda jo

taip ir manaiu, kad klaida butu fold pre QQ, kai buvo is pro 4-bet, nes buvo dar vienas calleris, ir turi gerus oddsus paziuret flopa, be to jis galejo raizint su AK, cia labiau orientuota ne i rezultata, o i zaidimo teisinguma.

va ka meile gavau, tipo analize:

The greatest overall strength in your game is Strategic Play. You are better than 95.30% of all people in this area. You have the ability to profit significantly from this skill. Continue to take advantage of it!

nors nelabai suprantu ka konkreciai reiskia tas strategic play siuo atveju.

edit: cia commentas 2+2 is yourpokertest apie sita testa:

Hello, I asked one of the moderators if it was ok for me to respond to some of the things that are being posted on here about our test that could use some clarification/correction.

First, I'll respond to this post. Amazing Allen NEVER folds KK preflop. In fact, on the hand he has KK (the 43rd hand), he open raises from 1st position. You have JJ from middle position. If you push like this poster did, he calls and you get stacked.

On the hand where he calls a push with QTs, you had A4 off-suit and were not in any position to make a play on it (you were in middle position, there were already 2 limpers in the pot). Frankly, the test is designed to analyze your ability, not consider bizarre possibilities. Once you push, the hand is over from an analysis point of view - the results are irrelevant. It wasn't a good time to attempt a push in low stakes full ring NL holdem.

Related to the comment that "playing good is definately not the way to get a good score," I think you might want to consider the other person who posted that he is a mid-stakes pro and got in the 150s, and many of the other respected players on here posting scores of 115 and up. Playing well is definitely the way to get a good score.

Just to clear up a couple other misconceptions about the test:

rminusq said, "Apparently, there's no such thing as a below avg. player." Just to clarify, the average score is 100 by mathematical design. It's not surprising that most 2+2ers are better than the average person who plays this. But...the average score is still 100. So, I'd venture that the people who are getting below average scores are just not posting about it!

gongshow said, "This test is LOL bad. I finish up 4 buyins and get 118." This test is not results oriented at all. It is completely based on your play, not your luck. Also, 118 is a good score, way above average.

jimpo said in response to several people complaining about the QQ vs AA hand, "Why would you assume that you would have gotten a higher score by folding the QQ hand? I bet, if the test is anything decent, you get negative points for folding the QQ preflop." He is absolutely correct. Folding that hand pre-flop would be a huge error. In fact, when it comes to crunch time post flop, you are getting 3:1 on your money, so you have to be over 75% sure that you are beat to make that fold. That's a judgment call and isn't an error either way unless you had much more information about your opponent than you had in the game.

Finally, keep in mind that this is designed to be a low stakes full ring game. The typical play in a full ring game differs substantially in aggressiveness compared to 6max. So if you are used to 6max, that makes a huge difference. Our 6max test is much more aggressive in nature than this free full ring one.

In summary, the game is not results-oriented, is based on overall patterns in your play, and has been developed and tested by a large number of highly skilled professional players (and not just TAGs). It is accurate, but you won't get a good score by trying to maximize your chip count for those 50 hands or by worrying about your hand by hand results.

Idomu, kas nors uzsisake ta detalia analize uz 10$? Ar ta ju analize verta tiek?

Idomu, kas nors uzsisake ta detalia analize uz 10$? Ar ta ju analize verta tiek?

siaip gal ir negaila butu tu 10$, bet labiau uzknistu pati ta pavedima daryti uzimtu @#$@#$ laiko.

bijau tikrintis, kai perskaitysiu harringtono tomus 3, tada bandysiu

As neziurejau, kaip ten sumoket jiem galima, moneybookeriu nepriima? A, tada blogai , neapsimoka

116. Kaip nežaidžiančiam casho užskaitau už visai nieko rezultatą

105 :]

tada vadinas blogas cia testas gal

O gal ne testas blogas

PokerIQScore™ is 121!

skaitau nemoku casho lost visai.

122

Nei su AK suckoutinau prieš KK, nei su QQ prieš AA, depresija varantis testas